Includoc, home

What the Microsoft Accessibility Checker doesn't check

Microsoft's Accessibility Checker finds missing alt text, titles and table headers, but not whether content makes sense. What it skips and how to check it.

Last updated

A document checker showing passes while a magnifying glass reveals problems it missed

Microsoft's Accessibility Checker in Word, PowerPoint, Excel and Outlook only tests what software can detect in the file: for example, whether alt text exists, whether tables have a header row, whether slides have titles and whether text contrast is too low. It doesn't check whether alt text is accurate, whether the reading order makes sense, whether color alone carries meaning, whether instructions depend on shape or position, whether link text makes sense in context, or whether passages in another language are marked. And it never checks the PDF you export.

What the checker does check

Microsoft publishes the rules the checker uses. In current versions, it checks that:

  • Pictures and other non-text content have alt text, and that the alt text isn't just a file name or file extension.
  • Tables have header information and a simple structure, without merged, split or nested cells.
  • Text has sufficient contrast with its background.
  • Word documents use heading styles, and fillable content controls have titles.
  • PowerPoint slides have titles, slide titles and section names are unique and meaningful, objects on each slide are in a logical order, and inserted audio and video have closed captions.
  • Excel sheet tabs have meaningful names, there are no blank sheets, and negative numbers aren't shown in red alone.
  • Access isn't restricted by rights-management settings that block screen readers.

It also lists alt text generated automatically by Office ("Intelligent Services") so you can review it. Microsoft sorts results into Errors, Warnings and Tips, and in Word for Microsoft 365 the Accessibility Assistant groups them by topic. Our Word, PowerPoint and Excel guides explain each result and its fix.

Microsoft is upfront about the limits. Its rules page says the checker catches most kinds of issues but not all of them, recommends reviewing your work yourself, and names information conveyed by color alone as something it can't detect.

What the checker doesn't check

These all need a person. Each maps to a WCAG 2.1 success criterion that the ADA Title II rule requires.

Not checkedWhy it mattersHow to check it yourself
Whether alt text is accurate and useful (1.1.1)The checker catches alt text that's just a file name, but "image" or "photo" passes, and so does a description of the wrong thingRead each description without looking at the image. Does it give the same information?
Whether the reading order makes sense (1.3.2)PowerPoint warns about slides whose object order looks wrong, but it can't judge whether the order makes sense, and Word doesn't check order at allIn PowerPoint, review the Reading Order pane on every slide. In Word, keep objects in line with text and listen to the document
Whether color alone carries meaning (1.4.1)"Items in red are overdue" means nothing to someone who can't see redLook for meaning shown only by color in text, charts, maps and tables, and add words, labels or patterns
Instructions that rely on shape, size or position (1.3.3)"Click the round button on the right" fails people who can't see the layoutSearch for words like "above", "below", "left", "right", "round" and "green" in instructions
Whether link text makes sense in context (2.4.4)Current rules don't evaluate link text, so "click here" and "read more" passRead the list of links on their own. Does each one say where it goes?
Whether headings and labels describe their content (2.4.6)A real heading called "Section 3" passes, but doesn't help people skimRead the outline in the Navigation Pane. Could someone find what they need from the headings alone?
Passages in another language (3.1.2)A Spanish paragraph in an English notice is read with English pronunciationSelect the passage and set its language with Review > Language > Set Proofing Language
Contrast of text inside pictures and charts (1.4.3, 1.4.11)The contrast check covers formatted text, not text that's part of an image or chartCheck by eye or with a color contrast tool
Pictures of text (1.4.5)A screenshot of a paragraph passes once it has alt text, but it can't be resized or reflowedReplace pictures of text with real text wherever you can
Whether captions are accuratePowerPoint and OneNote warn when inserted video or audio has no closed captions, but nothing checks that captions match what's said, or that audio has a transcriptWatch each video with captions on, and provide transcripts for audio
The exported PDFTags, reading order, artifacts and table headers in the PDF are never checkedCheck the PDF with a PDF checker such as our free checker, Acrobat Pro or PAC

Plain language is also outside the checker, but it isn't a WCAG 2.1 AA requirement. (Reading level is a Level AAA criterion.) It's still one of the most helpful things you can do for readers.

What happens to your file when you export a PDF

The checker looks only at the Office file. Microsoft's own documentation of how current versions (2408 and later on Windows) export to PDF shows several ways a document can look fine in Office and still lose information in the PDF:

  • Text inside SmartArt is marked as decoration in the PDF, so screen readers skip it unless the graphic's alt text includes it.
  • Content on a PowerPoint slide master or layout, such as a logo or a line of text, is treated as decoration.
  • Headers and footers in Word and PowerPoint are treated as decoration, so key information there isn't read.
  • An Excel range that isn't formatted as a table becomes a PDF table with no header cells.
  • Pictures with no alt text are still tagged as figures, with empty alt text that PDF checkers flag.
  • Excel for the web doesn't currently save accessible PDFs at all.

None of these show up in the Accessibility Checker. Check the exported PDF separately.

Why a clean result isn't the finish line

A document can pass the checker and still be hard to use. The checker is designed to catch common, detectable problems, and Microsoft's own guidance says to review your work yourself as well. Listening to the document with a screen reader is the best test of all. A useful way to think about it: the checker tells you whether the pieces are there. A person decides whether they're right.

If you came here from a training course or quiz question about what the checker doesn't check, the answer a course expects depends on its own material and the version it was written for. The table above reflects how the checker behaves in current versions of Microsoft 365.

A 10-minute manual check

  1. Run the checker and fix every error.
  2. Read the alt text. Go through each image's alt text and ask whether it gives the same information as the image.
  3. Read the outline. In Word, open View > Navigation Pane. In PowerPoint, check that every slide's title is unique and descriptive.
  4. Check the order. In PowerPoint, open the Reading Order pane on each slide. In Word, make sure pictures and shapes sit in line with text.
  5. Scan for color and position words. Fix anything that depends on color, shape or position alone.
  6. Read your links on their own. Rewrite any that don't say where they go.
  7. Mark other languages. Set the language for any passage that isn't in the document's main language.
  8. Export and check the PDF, if you're publishing one.
  9. Listen to a page or slide with a screen reader such as NVDA or Narrator, which is built into Windows.

Fix it automatically

Includoc checks Word and PowerPoint files and the PDFs made from them in one place, against WCAG 2.1 AA and PDF/UA. Alongside the machine checks, each report lists the items that need a person, such as color-only meaning, sensory instructions and link text, so they don't get forgotten. When you fix a file, our AI suggests better alt text, link descriptions and heading structure, and you approve each suggestion. Some judgments can only be made by someone who knows the content, and we leave those to you, clearly marked.

Upload your PDF to fix this automatically

Free check in seconds. Files are deleted within 24 hours.

Check your PDF

Standards

Standards references: Some alt text may not describe the image
Standard or toolReference
WCAG 2.1
PDF/UA-1 (ISO 14289-1)Clause 7.3
Standards references: Check that the reading order is logical
Standard or toolReference
WCAG 2.1
PDF/UA-1 (ISO 14289-1)Clause 7.2
Matterhorn ProtocolCheckpoint 09-001
Acrobat ruleLogical Reading Order
Standards references: Some link text may not make sense on its own
Standard or toolReference
WCAG 2.1
Standards references: Passages in another language may not be marked
Standard or toolReference
WCAG 2.1
PDF/UA-1 (ISO 14289-1)Clause 7.2
Matterhorn ProtocolCheckpoint 11-007

Sources